+ − Summary
+ − Full Texts (3)
+ − Actions (47)
- Governor Approved
- Effective Date February 27, 2022
- Public Act . . . . . . . . . 102-0614
- Sent to the Governor
- Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 House Concurs 117-000-000
- House Concurs
- Passed Both Houses
- Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion Filed Concur Rep. Lindsey LaPointe
- Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Referred to Rules Committee
- Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Rules Referred to Judiciary - Civil Committee
- Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Recommends Be Adopted Judiciary - Civil Committee; 015-000-000
- Third Reading - Passed; 059-000-000
- Arrived in House
- Placed on Calendar Order of Concurrence Senate Amendment(s) 1
- Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading ** May 28, 2021
- Second Reading
- Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading May 21, 2021
- Do Pass as Amended Judiciary; 007-000-000
- Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading May 20, 2021
- Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted
- Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Assignments Refers to Judiciary
- Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Sara Feigenholtz
- Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Assignments
- Assigned to Judiciary
- Arrive in Senate
- Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading
- Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. Sara Feigenholtz
- First Reading
- Referred to Assignments
- Third Reading - Consent Calendar - Passed 099-000-000
- Third Reading - Consent Calendar - First Day
- Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Consent Calendar
- Second Reading - Consent Calendar
- Held on Calendar Order of Second Reading - Consent Calendar
- Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Consent Calendar
- House Committee Amendment No. 2 Adopted in Judiciary - Civil Committee; by Voice Vote
- Do Pass as Amended / Consent Calendar Judiciary - Civil Committee; 016-000-000
- House Committee Amendment No. 1 Tabled Pursuant to Rule 40
- House Committee Amendment No. 2 Rules Refers to Judiciary - Civil Committee
- Assigned to Judiciary - Civil Committee
- House Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Lindsey LaPointe
- House Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules Committee
- House Committee Amendment No. 2 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Lindsey LaPointe
- House Committee Amendment No. 2 Referred to Rules Committee
- First Reading
- Referred to Rules Committee
- Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Lindsey LaPointe
+ − Adopted Amendments (2)
Senate Amendment 001
Allows a supporter in a supported decision-making agreement to ascertain the wishes and decisions of the principal in order to advocate that the wishes and decisions of an individual with disabilities are implemented (rather than "ascertain the wishes and decisions of the principal, assist in communicating those wishes and decisions to other persons, and advocate to ensure that the wishes and decisions of the principal are implemented"). Requires the Guardianship and Advocacy Commission to develop training and education materials for both principals and supporters. Provides that the Act is effective 6 months after becoming law (rather than immediately).
House Amendment 002
Deletes language providing that a person against whom there has been a finding of abuse, neglect, or exploitation of the principal, a child, an elderly individual, or a person with a disability is disqualified from acting as a supporter. Instead disqualifies a person who is listed on the Health Care Worker Registry maintained by the Department of Public Health as ineligible to work. Deletes language providing that a person against whom the principal has obtained an order of protection is disqualified from acting as a supporter. Instead disqualifies an individual who is the subject of a civil or criminal order prohibiting contact with the principal. Deletes language providing that any interested party with a reasonable basis to believe that the supporter is abusing or neglecting the principal shall have the right to petition for the appointment of a limited temporary guardian and a guardian ad litem for the purpose of determining if the support decision-making agreement should be terminated.
+ − Proposed Amendments (3)
+ − Statute Amended
- New Act